Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: TWLO stock price vs CSCO: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CSCO's multiple
Needs CSCO P/E.
Implied fair value · at TWLO's multiple
Needs TWLO P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
TWILIO INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$32.30
Base
$38.62
Bull
$46.85
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
ZoomInfo Technologies Inc.
TWLO vs ZI
Okta, Inc.
TWLO vs OKTA
8X8 INC /DE/
TWLO vs EGHT
Zoom Communications, Inc.
TWLO vs ZM
RingCentral, Inc.
TWLO vs RNG
HUBSPOT INC
TWLO vs HUBS
CIENA CORP
TWLO vs CIEN
Palo Alto Networks Inc
TWLO vs PANW
JUNIPER NETWORKS INC
TWLO vs JNPR
Fortinet, Inc.
TWLO vs FTNT
Arista Networks, Inc.
TWLO vs ANET
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
TWLO vs LDOS
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe TWLO can sustain high-teens growth while sharply expanding margins and ROIC toward CSCO-like levels, then hold or selectively buy; otherwise, the valuation data argues for caution because the current price is far above both CSCO-implied and DCF ranges.
TWLO trades at a massive valuation gap versus CSCO, with the supplied P/E-based implied price of $9.55 versus a current price of $197.35, implying -95.2% downside. The gap is driven by TWLO’s much higher earnings multiple and weaker cash-generation profile, even though its revenue growth is faster than CSCO’s.
Supporting Metrics
