Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: TTWO stock price vs AZPN: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at AZPN's multiple
Needs AZPN P/S.
Implied fair value · at TTWO's multiple
Needs Revenue / share, TTWO P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC. · implied price per share
At least 3 of the last 5 annual free-cash-flow observations must be positive.
ASPEN TECHNOLOGY, INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe TTWO can sustain 18.2% revenue growth while converting that growth into materially better margins and positive ROIC, then hold or add because the current price is only modestly above the lower end of its historical band and the balance sheet looks manageable; if not, the rich revenue multiple and negative earnings argue for caution.
TTWO trades at 6.8x P/S and 6.9x EV/Revenue, which is a rich multiple for a company with negative net income and slightly negative operating margin. The stock is currently near the middle of its historical band, but far above the DCF range, suggesting the market is valuing TTWO more on franchise durability and growth than on near-term cash earnings.
Supporting Metrics
