Tesla, Inc.
—- Market cap
- $1.78T
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$16.51B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: TSLA stock price vs TGT: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at TGT's multiple
Needs TGT P/E.
Implied fair value · at TSLA's multiple
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
15 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Tesla, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Target Corporation · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Lucid Group, Inc.
TSLA vs LCID
FORD MOTOR CO
TSLA vs F
General Motors Co
TSLA vs GM
Enphase Energy, Inc.
TSLA vs ENPH
PLUG POWER INC
TSLA vs PLUG
COPART INC
TSLA vs CPRT
Walmart Inc.
TSLA vs WMT
AMAZON COM INC
TSLA vs AMZN
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW
TSLA vs COST
BEST BUY CO INC
TSLA vs BBY
ROSS STORES, INC.
TSLA vs ROST
NORDSTROM INC
TSLA vs JWN
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe TSLA can sustain a major re-rating and materially improve growth and margins from current levels, then avoid using TGT-style multiples to value it; otherwise, the current price looks difficult to justify because TSLA trades far above both TGT implied range and DCF range despite only mixed fundamental advantages.
TSLA trades at a massive premium to TGT despite a much smaller revenue base and only slightly higher net margin. The valuation gap is most extreme on earnings and cash-flow proxies, where TSLA’s P/E, P/S, and EV/EBITDA are many multiples of TGT’s.
Supporting Metrics