Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: TSLA stock price vs ABG: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at ABG's multiple
Needs ABG P/E.
Implied fair value · at TSLA's multiple
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Tesla, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
ASBURY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Lucid Group, Inc.
TSLA vs LCID
FORD MOTOR CO
TSLA vs F
General Motors Co
TSLA vs GM
Enphase Energy, Inc.
TSLA vs ENPH
PLUG POWER INC
TSLA vs PLUG
COPART INC
TSLA vs CPRT
PENSKE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC.
TSLA vs PAG
GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE INC
TSLA vs GPI
LITHIA MOTORS INC
TSLA vs LAD
CARMAX INC
TSLA vs KMX
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe TSLA can reaccelerate growth and sustain premium margins well beyond the current -2.9% revenue trend, then holding may be justified; otherwise, the data supports reducing exposure because the stock is priced at an extreme premium to ABG despite only mixed fundamental and quality advantages.
TSLA trades at a massive premium to ABG across P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue, while ABG-implied price is far below the current quote. The implied downside is -96.8%, and TSLA also sits well above both ABG-implied range and the DCF range.
Supporting Metrics
