Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: TSCO stock price vs MSFT: inconclusive — current versus $55.50 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MSFT's multiple
Implied fair value · at TSCO's multiple
Needs TSCO P/E.
Close Dec 31, 2025
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
TRACTOR SUPPLY CO /DE/ · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
MICROSOFT CORP · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
HOME DEPOT, INC.
TSCO vs HD
LOWES COMPANIES INC
TSCO vs LOW
FASTENAL CO
TSCO vs FAST
MASCO CORP /DE/
TSCO vs MAS
Apple Inc.
TSCO vs AAPL
Alphabet Inc.
TSCO vs GOOGL
AMAZON COM INC
TSCO vs AMZN
ADOBE INC.
TSCO vs ADBE
NVIDIA CORP
TSCO vs NVDA
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
TSCO vs CSCO
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe TSCO can sustain its current historical trading band while gradually improving growth and margins, then a cautious hold or accumulate approach makes sense because the stock already trades near the top of its historical range and MSFT-implied upside depends on using MSFT-like multiples that TSCO does not obviously deserve.
TSCO trades at 14.4x P/E versus MSFT at 35.5x, while also screening at 1.0x P/S versus 10.5x for MSFT. On a relative basis TSCO looks deeply discounted, but its lower growth and profitability profile support a materially lower multiple.
Supporting Metrics
