Terreno Realty Corporation
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$25.02M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: TRNO stock price vs PSA: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PSA's multiple
Needs PSA P/E.
Implied fair value · at TRNO's multiple
Needs TRNO P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
16 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Terreno Realty Corporation · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Public Storage · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Prologis, Inc.
TRNO vs PLD
INNOVATIVE INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES INC
TRNO vs IIPR
Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.
TRNO vs REXR
STAG Industrial, Inc.
TRNO vs STAG
National Storage Affiliates Trust
TRNO vs NSA
WEYERHAEUSER CO
TRNO vs WY
COSTAR GROUP, INC.
TRNO vs CSGP
WELLTOWER INC.
TRNO vs WELL
UDR, Inc.
TRNO vs UDR
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe TRNO can sustain its 24.5% revenue growth and convert that into durable earnings quality, then holding or accumulating on weakness is reasonable because the stock trades at a much lower P/E than PSA and carries lower leverage, despite mixed quality signals.
TRNO’s current price of $71.65 sits well below the P/E-implied price of $140.68, suggesting substantial upside on that single lens. However, the broader valuation picture is mixed because TRNO trades at a higher P/S and EV/Revenue than PSA, while still looking cheaper on EV/EBITDA and P/E.
Supporting Metrics