Tutor Perini Corporation
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- +$407.37M
- Cash
- −$734.55M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: TPC stock price vs FSLY: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at FSLY's multiple
Needs FSLY P/E.
Implied fair value · at TPC's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative, TPC P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Tutor Perini Corporation · implied price per share
Bear
$109.28
Base
$127.45
Bull
$151.11
Fastly, Inc. · implied price per share
At least 3 of the last 5 annual free-cash-flow observations must be positive.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
EMCOR Group, Inc.
TPC vs EME
AECOM
TPC vs ACM
MASTEC INC
TPC vs MTZ
MYR GROUP INC.
TPC vs MYRG
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INC
TPC vs GVA
Primoris Services Corp
TPC vs PRIM
Cloudflare, Inc.
TPC vs NET
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES INC
TPC vs AKAM
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
TPC vs LUMN
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
TPC vs CSCO
VIASAT INC
TPC vs VSAT
Zscaler, Inc.
TPC vs ZS
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe TPC can sustain positive margins and high ROIC while continuing to grow revenue, then TPC looks attractive relative to FSLY on a sales-multiple basis because the current discount is extreme; if not, the DCF range suggests the market price may already be rich versus intrinsic value.
TPC trades at 0.7x P/S versus FSLY at 4.5x, implying a very large relative valuation discount and the stated FSLY-implied value of $477.42 versus the current $76.75. However, the gap is driven more by business-model and profitability differences than by a straightforward mispricing signal.
Supporting Metrics