Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: TMUS stock price vs VTR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at VTR's multiple
Needs VTR P/E.
Implied fair value · at TMUS's multiple
Needs TMUS P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
T-MOBILE US, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$58.94
Base
$82.78
Bull
$113.81
Ventas, Inc. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
AT&T INC.
TMUS vs T
COMCAST CORP
TMUS vs CMCSA
AMERICAN TOWER CORP /MA/
TMUS vs AMT
CROWN CASTLE INC.
TMUS vs CCI
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC
TMUS vs VZ
Clearfield, Inc.
TMUS vs CLFD
WELLTOWER INC.
TMUS vs WELL
Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc.
TMUS vs SBRA
NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS INC
TMUS vs NHI
OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS INC
TMUS vs OHI
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe TMUS should be valued on its own telecom fundamentals rather than against VTR's much richer multiples, then TMUS looks more like a fair-to-modestly undervalued holding than a 848.4% upside opportunity because its current price sits within the historical band and below the DCF range while fundamentals remain strong.
The stated implied price of $1,680.48 versus TMUS at $177.19 suggests an 848.4% upside, but that conclusion is not economically believable given the cross-sector VTR pairing and the extreme divergence in valuation multiples. On the provided data, TMUS trades at 18.2x P/E, 2.2x P/S, and 6.4x EV/EBITDA, while VTR trades at 172.9x P/E, 8.2x P/S, and 40.9x EV/EBITDA, so VTR is clearly much more expensive rather than TMUS being deeply discounted.
Supporting Metrics
