T-Mobile Us, Inc.
$275.85B- Market cap
- $190.03B
- Debt
- +$91.42B
- Cash
- −$5.60B
Capital structure 68% equity / 32% debt · EV / Revenue 3.12x · EV proxy / EBITDA proxy 8.68x
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2026 ·
Decision snapshot: TMUS stock price vs CRM: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CRM's multiple
Needs CRM P/E.
Implied fair value · at TMUS's multiple
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Capital structure 68% equity / 32% debt · EV / Revenue 3.12x · EV proxy / EBITDA proxy 8.68x
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
T-MOBILE US, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$75.82
Base
$105.53
Bull
$145.63
Salesforce, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
AT&T INC.
TMUS vs T
COMCAST CORP
TMUS vs CMCSA
AMERICAN TOWER CORP /MA/
TMUS vs AMT
CROWN CASTLE INC.
TMUS vs CCI
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC
TMUS vs VZ
Clearfield, Inc.
TMUS vs CLFD
MICROSOFT CORP
TMUS vs MSFT
ORACLE CORP
TMUS vs ORCL
ADOBE INC.
TMUS vs ADBE
Workday, Inc.
TMUS vs WDAY
INTUIT INC.
TMUS vs INTU
Paycom Software, Inc.
TMUS vs PAYC
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe TMUS can sustain its superior ROIC, EBITDA margin, and low leverage without needing CRM-like growth to justify valuation, then TMUS looks attractive to own because it trades at a lower P/E and much lower EV/EBITDA than CRM while still screening as financially healthy.
TMUS trades at a meaningful discount to CRM on earnings and sales-based multiples, despite the model implying a 33.8% upside to $237.88. The gap is most pronounced on EV/EBITDA and EV/Revenue, suggesting the market is pricing TMUS as a lower-multiple telecom asset rather than a higher-growth compounder.
Supporting Metrics