Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: TGT stock price vs WHR: inconclusive — current versus $51.55 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at WHR's multiple
Implied fair value · at TGT's multiple
Needs TGT P/E.
Snapshot Sep 10, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
15 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Capital structure 26% equity / 74% debt · EV / Revenue 0.53x · EV proxy / EBITDA proxy 6.97x
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Target Corporation · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
WHIRLPOOL CORP /DE/ · implied price per share
Bear
-$46.25
Base
-$39.05
Bull
-$26.28
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Walmart Inc.
TGT vs WMT
AMAZON COM INC
TGT vs AMZN
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW
TGT vs COST
BEST BUY CO INC
TGT vs BBY
ROSS STORES, INC.
TGT vs ROST
NORDSTROM INC
TGT vs JWN
HOME DEPOT, INC.
TGT vs HD
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
TGT vs GE
HELEN OF TROY LTD
TGT vs HELE
NEWELL BRANDS INC.
TGT vs NWL
Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.
TGT vs SPB
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe TGT’s stronger ROIC, lower leverage, and better margin profile can justify trading above WHR on a relative basis, then hold or accumulate on pullbacks; if you require WHR-based valuation discipline, then reduce exposure because WHR-implied framework points to meaningful downside versus WHR.
On the provided P/E WHR-multiple framework, TGT’s current price of $149.70 is far above the implied price of $62.17, which indicates a -58.5% downside versus WHR. However, this gap is likely distorted by WHR’s much lower P/E of 7.6x and higher leverage, so the comparison suggests relative richness rather than a clean fair value conclusion.
Supporting Metrics
