Target Corporation
—- Market cap
- $70.79B
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$250.00M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 ·
Decision snapshot: TGT stock price at discount vs NEE $155.83 current versus $202.78 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at NEE's multiple
Implied fair value · at TGT's multiple
Snapshot Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Lower P/E
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
15 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Target Corporation · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
NEXTERA ENERGY INC · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Walmart Inc.
TGT vs WMT
AMAZON COM INC
TGT vs AMZN
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW
TGT vs COST
BEST BUY CO INC
TGT vs BBY
ROSS STORES, INC.
TGT vs ROST
NORDSTROM INC
TGT vs JWN
Duke Energy CORP
TGT vs DUK
DOMINION ENERGY, INC
TGT vs D
SPIRE INC
TGT vs SR
PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INC
TGT vs PEG
DTE ENERGY CO
TGT vs DTE
PG&E Corp
TGT vs PCG
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe TGT can reaccelerate revenue growth and expand margins toward stronger retail comp levels, then the current price may be attractive because it already trades at a major discount to NEE on P/E, P/S, and EV/EBITDA despite lower leverage.
TGT trades at 17.8x P/E versus NEE at 26.3x, yet the implied price of $214.14 suggests meaningful upside from the current $144.49. However, NEE comparison is difficult because NEE’s much higher multiples are supported by a very different business model and much stronger margins and growth.
Supporting Metrics