Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: TGT stock price vs MSFT: inconclusive — current versus $219.04 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MSFT's multiple
Implied fair value · at TGT's multiple
Needs TGT P/E.
Close Dec 31, 2025
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
15 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Target Corporation · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
MICROSOFT CORPORATION · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Walmart Inc.
TGT vs WMT
AMAZON COM INC
TGT vs AMZN
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW
TGT vs COST
BEST BUY CO INC
TGT vs BBY
ROSS STORES, INC.
TGT vs ROST
NORDSTROM INC
TGT vs JWN
Apple Inc.
TGT vs AAPL
Alphabet Inc.
TGT vs GOOGL
ADOBE INC.
TGT vs ADBE
NVIDIA CORP
TGT vs NVDA
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
TGT vs CSCO
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe TGT can re-accelerate growth and expand margins toward a more premium retail profile, then consider the stock, because the current valuation is low versus MSFT; otherwise, the data supports treating TGT as a lower-quality business deserving a discount rather than a rerating.
TGT trades at a steep discount to MSFT across earnings and sales multiples, with the gap far too large to justify on valuation alone. The market is paying 15.4x P/E and 0.5x P/S for TGT versus 35.5x and 11.3x for MSFT, reflecting very different business quality and growth profiles.
Supporting Metrics
