Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: TGT stock price vs CYBR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CYBR's multiple
Needs CYBR P/E.
Implied fair value · at TGT's multiple
Needs Annual EPS.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
15 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Target Corporation · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
CYBERARK SOFTWARE LTD. · implied price per share
The ordinary-share to listed-security ratio could not be verified.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Walmart Inc.
TGT vs WMT
AMAZON COM INC
TGT vs AMZN
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW
TGT vs COST
BEST BUY CO INC
TGT vs BBY
ROSS STORES, INC.
TGT vs ROST
NORDSTROM INC
TGT vs JWN
Okta, Inc.
TGT vs OKTA
Tenable Holdings, Inc.
TGT vs TENB
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
TGT vs CRWD
Zscaler, Inc.
TGT vs ZS
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe TGT can stabilize revenue and sustain current margins, then holding or accumulating makes sense because it is already profitable, has a 17.8x P/E, and trades within its historical band despite being above the DCF range.
TGT trades at 17.8x P/E and 0.6x P/S, with 8.4x EV/EBITDA and 0.7x EV/Revenue, which looks reasonable for a profitable retailer but not obviously distressed. CYBR lacks earnings-based multiples because net income is negative, so the comparison is less about direct valuation and more about quality-versus-growth tradeoff.
Supporting Metrics
