Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: TEX stock price vs LMT: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at LMT's multiple
Needs LMT P/E.
Implied fair value · at TEX's multiple
Needs TEX P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Terex Corporation · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
CATERPILLAR INC
TEX vs CAT
DEERE & CO
TEX vs DE
CNH Industrial N.V.
TEX vs CNH
HYSTER-YALE, INC.
TEX vs HY
BOEING CO
TEX vs BA
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP /DE/
TEX vs NOC
TEXTRON INC
TEX vs TXT
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC.
TEX vs HII
AXON ENTERPRISE, INC.
TEX vs AXON
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
TEX vs HWM
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe TEX can sustain mid-single-digit growth and improve operating conversion without deteriorating leverage, then TEX looks worth owning on a relative-value basis because it trades below LMT on every major valuation multiple while offering similar revenue growth.
On a P/E basis, TEX trades at 19.3x versus LMT at 27.3x, while LMT-implied price of $90.85 suggests about 41.0% upside from the current $64.41. However, TEX also sits above the historical band midpoint and far above the DCF range, which weakens the argument for a clean valuation discount.
Supporting Metrics
