Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 ·
Decision snapshot: TER stock price vs NXPI: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at NXPI's multiple
Needs NXPI P/E.
Implied fair value · at TER's multiple
Needs Annual EPS.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
TERADYNE, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
NXP Semiconductors N.V. · implied price per share
The ordinary-share to listed-security ratio could not be verified.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
APPLIED MATERIALS INC /DE
TER vs AMAT
INTEL CORP
TER vs INTC
LAM RESEARCH CORP
TER vs LRCX
KLA CORP
TER vs KLAC
SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS, INC.
TER vs SWKS
LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP
TER vs LSCC
Qualcomm Incorporated
TER vs QCOM
Broadcom Inc.
TER vs AVGO
Texas Instruments Incorporated
TER vs TXN
NVIDIA Corporation
TER vs NVDA
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe TER can sustain its current growth and justify a very large premium to NXPI on a longer-term basis, then hold or avoid adding aggressively; otherwise, reduce exposure because NXPI-implied and DCF ranges are far below the current price.
TER trades at a severe premium to NXPI across earnings, sales, and cash-flow proxies, while the model implies a price far below the current quote. The P/E-based implied price is $101.44 versus a current price of $396.10, indicating -74.4% downside, and NXPI-implied range of $68.51 to $103.60 sits well below the stock.
Supporting Metrics
