Trip.com Group Limited
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- —
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: TCOM stock price vs MGM: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MGM's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, MGM P/E.
Implied fair value · at TCOM's multiple
Needs TCOM P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Ten period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Trip.com Group Limited · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
MGM Resorts International · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Booking Holdings Inc.
TCOM vs BKNG
Expedia Group, Inc.
TCOM vs EXPE
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL INC /MD/
TCOM vs MAR
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
TCOM vs HLT
Airbnb, Inc.
TCOM vs ABNB
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP
TCOM vs LVS
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
TCOM vs CZR
WYNN RESORTS LTD
TCOM vs WYNN
BOYD GAMING CORP
TCOM vs BYD
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe TCOM can sustain 20%+ revenue growth while preserving its very high margins, then hold or add selectively despite the valuation premium, because the DCF range and quality metrics support a stronger long-term case than the MGM-based implied price suggests.
TCOM is priced well above the MGM-based implied value, with a current price of $47.30 versus an implied $36.68, implying -22.5% downside on this framework. The gap is driven more by TCOM’s much higher growth and profitability profile than by valuation support, but the stock still trades near the upper end of its historical band.
Supporting Metrics