Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
—- Market cap
- $12.64B
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$1.16B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: SWKS stock price vs FTV: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at FTV's multiple
Needs FTV P/E.
Implied fair value · at SWKS's multiple
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Fortive Corporation · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
ANALOG DEVICES INC
SWKS vs ADI
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
SWKS vs TXN
QUALCOMM INC/DE
SWKS vs QCOM
Broadcom Inc.
SWKS vs AVGO
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC
SWKS vs MCHP
APPLIED MATERIALS INC /DE
SWKS vs AMAT
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO
SWKS vs EMR
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
SWKS vs HON
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC
SWKS vs ROK
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
SWKS vs KEYS
TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INC
SWKS vs TDY
AMETEK INC/
SWKS vs AME
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe SWKS can sustain its current profitability and avoid further revenue deterioration, then SWKS looks attractive on a relative valuation basis versus FTV because it trades at meaningfully lower multiples despite better ROIC and a cleaner balance sheet.
SWKS trades at materially lower valuation multiples than FTV, which supports the appearance of a discount. However, the gap is partially explained by SWKS's softer profitability profile and slower recent revenue trend, while FTV carries a much higher multiple base despite weaker revenue growth.
Supporting Metrics