Sun Communities, Inc
—- Market cap
- $14.16B
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$569.60M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 ·
Decision snapshot: SUI stock price vs CSGP: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CSGP's multiple
Needs CSGP P/E.
Implied fair value · at SUI's multiple
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
16 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
SUN COMMUNITIES, INC · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
COSTAR GROUP, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
EQUITY LIFESTYLE PROPERTIES INC
SUI vs ELS
UMH PROPERTIES, INC.
SUI vs UMH
EPR PROPERTIES
SUI vs EPR
American Homes 4 Rent
SUI vs AMH
WELLTOWER INC.
SUI vs WELL
Prologis, Inc.
SUI vs PLD
Public Storage
SUI vs PSA
EQUITY RESIDENTIAL
SUI vs EQR
CROWN CASTLE INC.
SUI vs CCI
CENTERSPACE
SUI vs CSR
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe SUI can stabilize revenue and sustain its current profitability, then holding or modestly adding makes sense because it trades near the lower half of its historical/DCF range with stronger current margins than CSGP; if you expect continued revenue decline, the valuation support weakens quickly despite the lower P/E.
On a P/E basis, SUI looks dramatically cheaper than CSGP at 11.2x versus 1479.0x, but that comparison is distorted by CSGP’s near-zero earnings. On enterprise-value metrics, the picture flips somewhat: SUI trades at 9.4x EV/Revenue and 12.4x EV/EBITDA versus CSGP at 3.2x and 42.6x, respectively.
Supporting Metrics