Seagate Technology Holdings plc
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$1.70B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: STX stock price vs LDOS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at LDOS's multiple
Needs LDOS P/E.
Implied fair value · at STX's multiple
Needs STX P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Ten period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Leidos Holdings, Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
WESTERN DIGITAL CORP
STX vs WDC
NetApp, Inc.
STX vs NTAP
Dell Technologies Inc.
STX vs DELL
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co
STX vs HPE
QUANTUM CORP /DE/
STX vs QMCO
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP
STX vs IBM
Accenture plc
STX vs ACN
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
STX vs LMT
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP /DE/
STX vs NOC
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP
STX vs GD
ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORP
STX vs ZBRA
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe STX can sustain its 38.9% revenue growth and 20.8% operating margin, then hold or accumulate on weakness because its operating performance is much stronger than LDOS even though the valuation screens are extremely expensive versus peers and DCF.
The valuation gap is very large: STX trades at 121.1x P/E versus LDOS at 9.8x, and 20.2x P/S versus 0.8x for LDOS. However, the current price of $820.16 sits within STX's historical band of $738.14 to $902.18, so the stock is expensive versus peers but not obviously stretched versus its own recent trading range.
Supporting Metrics