State Street Corp
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- —
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: STT stock price vs BLK: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at BLK's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, BLK P/E.
Implied fair value · at STT's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, STT P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
STATE STREET CORP · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
BlackRock, Inc. · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
STT · not enough data.
BLK · not enough data.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
STT vs JPM
Bank of America Corporation
STT vs BAC
Citigroup Inc.
STT vs C
Wells Fargo & Company
STT vs WFC
NORTHERN TRUST CORP
STT vs NTRS
PRICE T ROWE GROUP INC
STT vs TROW
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
STT vs GS
Morgan Stanley
STT vs MS
Blackstone Inc.
STT vs BX
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe STT can close the growth and profitability gap versus BLK without a major deterioration in quality, then STT looks attractive on a relative valuation basis because it trades at roughly half BLK's P/S and a meaningfully lower P/E despite upside to the model price.
STT trades at a significant discount to BLK on headline valuation, with a 19.5x P/E versus 31.9x for BLK and 3.6x P/S versus 7.2x for BLK. The implied price of $299.92 is well above the current $183.67, but BLK-implied range of $342.06 to $2615.97 and DCF range of $315.55 to $426.92 suggest the market is already embedding a meaningful upside case.
Supporting Metrics