Stem, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$48.92M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: STEM stock price vs OC: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at OC's multiple
Needs OC P/S.
Implied fair value · at STEM's multiple
Needs STEM P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Stem, Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Owens Corning · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Enphase Energy, Inc.
STEM vs ENPH
Fluence Energy, Inc.
STEM vs FLNC
Tesla, Inc.
STEM vs TSLA
ITRON, INC.
STEM vs ITRI
CARLISLE COMPANIES INC
STEM vs CSL
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC
STEM vs AWI
NUCOR CORP
STEM vs NUE
LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORP
STEM vs LPX
JELD-WEN Holding, Inc.
STEM vs JELD
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe STEM can sustain revenue growth while materially improving operating margin and avoiding balance-sheet stress, then the current price may look attractive relative to the P/S-implied value because STEM trades at only 0.4x sales; otherwise, the weak Altman Z-Score and -35.6% operating margin argue against relying on OC-implied upside alone.
On a P/S basis, STEM trades at 0.4x versus OC at 1.2x, which supports a large OC-implied upside to $21.77 versus the current $7.85 price. However, OC comparison is noisy because the two companies show very different profitability and margin profiles, and STEM’s own historical band suggests it is already near the top of its recent trading range.
Supporting Metrics