Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: ST stock price vs MMC: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MMC's multiple
Needs MMC P/E.
Implied fair value · at ST's multiple
Needs ST P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
SENSATA TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING PLC · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$76.37
Base
$95.86
Bull
$121.24
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
ST vs HON
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO
ST vs EMR
TE Connectivity plc
ST vs TEL
AMPHENOL CORP /DE/
ST vs APH
AMETEK INC/
ST vs AME
Fortive Corp
ST vs FTV
Aon plc
ST vs AON
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
ST vs AJG
BROWN & BROWN, INC.
ST vs BRO
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
ST vs AIG
Accenture plc
ST vs ACN
ROBERT HALF INC.
ST vs RHI
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe ST can reaccelerate growth and materially expand margins from -5.8% revenue growth and 0.8% net margin toward MMC-like profitability, then consider holding or adding; otherwise, the current valuation does not look compelling given weaker quality and higher leverage.
ST trades at $46.64, which is within its historical band of $41.98-$51.30 but above the low end of its DCF range of $29.24-$39.56. With no implied price from the P/E framework and many MMC valuation fields unavailable for MMC, the main takeaway is that ST does not screen as clearly mispriced relative to its own intrinsic range.
Supporting Metrics
