Sensata Technologies Holding Plc
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$573.00M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: ST stock price vs GE: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at GE's multiple
Needs GE P/E.
Implied fair value · at ST's multiple
Needs ST P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
14 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
SENSATA TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING PLC · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe ST can meaningfully reaccelerate revenue growth and expand margins toward GE-like profitability, then consider holding or adding; otherwise, the data favor reducing exposure because ST trades well above its DCF and P/E-implied values despite weaker growth, returns, and earnings quality.
ST trades at $50.50 versus a P/E implied price of $8.65, implying -82.9% downside, and it also sits above the DCF range of $29.24 to $39.56. While ST’s EV/EBITDA of 14.1x is close to GE’s 14.2x, ST is far more expensive on earnings and sales multiples, suggesting the market is paying for a quality profile that the fundamentals do not fully support.
Supporting Metrics