Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: SPR stock price vs MMM: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MMM's multiple
Needs MMM P/S.
Implied fair value · at SPR's multiple
Needs SPR P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
3M COMPANY · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
BOEING CO
SPR vs BA
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
SPR vs GE
HEXCEL CORP /DE/
SPR vs HXL
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
SPR vs HWM
AAR CORP
SPR vs AIR
TransDigm Group INC
SPR vs TDG
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
SPR vs HON
DANAHER CORP /DE/
SPR vs DHR
Johnson & Johnson
SPR vs JNJ
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO
SPR vs EMR
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe SPR can rapidly and sustainably reverse its negative margins toward MMM-like profitability, then a constructive view could be justified; otherwise, stay cautious because SPR’s -33.9% net margin and 2/9 F-Score do not support the implied $197.35 valuation well.
The comparison suggests a large valuation disconnect, with SPR’s implied price at $197.35 versus MMM’s established trading multiples of 3.7x P/S and 17.8x EV/EBITDA. Because SPR’s earnings and margin profile is deeply negative, the implied valuation looks generous relative to MMM’s profitable, cash-generating profile.
Supporting Metrics
