Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: SPIR stock price vs AKR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at AKR's multiple
Needs AKR P/E.
Implied fair value · at SPIR's multiple
Needs SPIR P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
SPIRE GLOBAL, INC. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
ACADIA REALTY TRUST · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe SPIR can convert its gross margin and reported net income into sustained positive operating growth and normalized margins, then SPIR may be worth owning or adding because the P/E and EV/EBITDA screens look far cheaper than AKR; if not, the weak revenue trend and negative quality scores argue for caution.
On a P/E basis, SPIR appears dramatically cheaper than AKR at 7.8x versus 223.6x, which mechanically drives the large implied upside shown in the valuation output. However, on revenue-based valuation SPIR is only moderately cheaper, with P/S of 5.0x versus AKR at 7.3x, suggesting the apparent discount is less extreme when earnings quality and scale are considered.
Supporting Metrics
