Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: SNA stock price vs PH: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PH's multiple
Needs PH P/E.
Implied fair value · at SNA's multiple
Needs SNA P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
18 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Snap-on Inc · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Parker-Hannifin Corp · implied price per share
Bear
$271.45
Base
$330.29
Bull
$406.93
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Trane Technologies plc
SNA vs TT
IDEX CORP /DE/
SNA vs IEX
SPX Technologies, Inc.
SNA vs SPXC
Xylem Inc.
SNA vs XYL
DOVER Corp
SNA vs DOV
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
SNA vs IR
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
SNA vs HON
NORDSON CORP
SNA vs NDSN
Eaton Corp plc
SNA vs ETN
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO
SNA vs EMR
DANAHER CORP /DE/
SNA vs DHR
ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
SNA vs ITW
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe SNA’s higher-quality margins and stronger balance sheet justify a premium to DCF but not a full re-rating to PH’s earnings multiple, then holding or modest accumulation makes sense because SNA already trades at a large discount to PH on P/E, P/S, and EV/EBITDA while maintaining stronger operating margins and leverage.
SNA trades at a clear discount to PH on earnings and revenue-based multiples, despite similar profitability quality and better balance-sheet metrics. The market is assigning PH a much richer multiple even though SNA’s operating margins, ROIC, and net margin are at least comparable and in some cases stronger.
Supporting Metrics
