Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: SLG stock price vs UFPI: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at UFPI's multiple
Needs UFPI P/S.
Implied fair value · at SLG's multiple
Needs SLG P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
SL GREEN REALTY CORP · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
UFP INDUSTRIES, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
BXP, Inc.
SLG vs BXP
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
SLG vs VNO
Paramount Group, Inc.
SLG vs PGRE
Empire State Realty Trust, Inc.
SLG vs ESRT
COSTAR GROUP, INC.
SLG vs CSGP
WELLTOWER INC.
SLG vs WELL
WEYERHAEUSER CO
SLG vs WY
LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORP
SLG vs LPX
BOISE CASCADE Co
SLG vs BCC
RAYONIER INC
SLG vs RYN
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe SLG can sustain growth while materially improving profitability and reducing leverage, then you could justify holding or buying, because the current price is far above UFPI-implied and DCF-based ranges; otherwise, the data favors avoiding SLG at this valuation.
SLG trades at a large valuation premium to UFPI across P/S, EV/Revenue, EV/EBITDA, and P/E, yet the implied price from UFPI-based P/S approach is far below the current share price. The stock sits near the top of its historical band, which reinforces that the current quote is closer to the upper end of recent trading than to UFPI-implied value.
Supporting Metrics
