The J. M. Smucker Company
—- Market cap
- $12.94B
- Debt
- +$6.96B
- Cash
- —
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Capital structure 65% equity / 35% debt
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 ·
Decision snapshot: SJM stock price vs BLK: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at BLK's multiple
Needs BLK P/S.
Implied fair value · at SJM's multiple
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Capital structure 65% equity / 35% debt
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
The J. M. Smucker Company · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
BlackRock, Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
COCA COLA CO
SJM vs KO
PEPSICO INC
SJM vs PEP
GENERAL MILLS INC
SJM vs GIS
COLGATE PALMOLIVE CO
SJM vs CL
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
SJM vs LW
HORMEL FOODS CORP /DE/
SJM vs HRL
STATE STREET CORP
SJM vs STT
NORTHERN TRUST CORP
SJM vs NTRS
PRICE T ROWE GROUP INC
SJM vs TROW
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
SJM vs GS
Morgan Stanley
SJM vs MS
Blackstone Inc.
SJM vs BX
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe SJM can materially improve earnings, deleverage, and re-rate toward BLK-like profitability and growth, then avoid using the P/S implied upside at face value because the current operating and balance-sheet data argue against it.
The valuation gap is extreme: SJM's current price of $116.31 sits far below the $542.11 implied price from the P/S framework, implying 366.1% upside, but that result conflicts with the rest of the dataset. On every operating and quality metric provided, SJM is materially weaker than BLK, so BLK-implied valuation looks mechanically inflated rather than fundamentally justified.
Supporting Metrics