Signet Jewelers Limited
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$874.80M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: SIG stock price vs GTY: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at GTY's multiple
Needs GTY P/E.
Implied fair value · at SIG's multiple
Needs SIG P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
GETTY REALTY CORP. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Macy's, Inc.
SIG vs M
NORDSTROM INC
SIG vs JWN
KOHLS Corp
SIG vs KSS
TARGET CORP
SIG vs TGT
TJX COMPANIES INC /DE/
SIG vs TJX
REALTY INCOME CORP
SIG vs O
AGREE REALTY CORP
SIG vs ADC
Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
SIG vs FCPT
NNN REIT, INC.
SIG vs NNN
Brixmor Property Group Inc.
SIG vs BRX
TANGER INC.
SIG vs SKT
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe SIG can sustain its current profitability and leverage profile while closing part of the valuation gap to GTY, then SIG looks attractive to own because it is cheaper on P/E, P/S, and EV/EBITDA while also showing stronger ROIC and a stronger balance sheet.
SIG trades at a much lower multiple than GTY on every valuation metric shown, with P/E at 11.9x versus 25.4x, P/S at 0.5x versus 9.4x, and EV/EBITDA at 3.2x versus 17.9x. The model’s implied price of $180.15 suggests 114.1% upside versus the current $84.14, though GTY range is very wide and therefore less precise.
Supporting Metrics