Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 · View financials
Decision snapshot: SIG stock price vs DUK: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at DUK's multiple
Needs DUK P/E.
Implied fair value · at SIG's multiple
Needs SIG P/E.
Live quote
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: SIG FY 2026 (ended Jan 31, 2026) · DUK FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025). Fiscal years are not aligned.
Trendline
Six fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Price framework
Discounted free cash flow, then bridged to a per-share price. Same assumptions applied to both companies.
SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED · implied price per share
Bear
$116.85
Base
$137.47
Bull
$158.09
Duke Energy CORP · implied price per share
Bear
$30.13
Base
$35.45
Bull
$40.76
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
0.15x
1.73x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
-0.71x
6.40x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$889.60M
$7.70B
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
$295.10M
$89.84B
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Macy's, Inc.
SIG vs M
NORDSTROM INC
SIG vs JWN
KOHLS Corp
SIG vs KSS
TARGET CORP
SIG vs TGT
TJX COMPANIES INC /DE/
SIG vs TJX
NEXTERA ENERGY INC
SIG vs NEE
SOUTHERN CO
SIG vs SO
DOMINION ENERGY, INC
SIG vs D
EXELON CORP
SIG vs EXC
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
SIG vs AEP
XCEL ENERGY INC
SIG vs XEL
Live quote
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
If you believe SIG’s lower multiples are not justified by its business-model differences versus DUK, then SIG looks attractive to own because it combines a deep valuation discount with strong capital efficiency and balance-sheet quality.
SIG trades at a wide discount to DUK on earnings, sales, and enterprise value multiples, which supports a materially higher implied value than the current price. The gap is driven by SIG’s much lower P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue despite comparatively stronger capital efficiency and a cleaner balance sheet.
Supporting Metrics
