Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: SBUX stock price vs EAT: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at EAT's multiple
Needs EAT P/E.
Implied fair value · at SBUX's multiple
Needs SBUX P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Starbucks Corporation · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$106.35
Base
$126.42
Bull
$152.55
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
McDonald's Corporation
SBUX vs MCD
PepsiCo, Inc.
SBUX vs PEP
The Coca-Cola Company
SBUX vs KO
DOMINOS PIZZA INC
SBUX vs DPZ
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
SBUX vs CMG
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
SBUX vs BLMN
DARDEN RESTAURANTS INC
SBUX vs DRI
CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC
SBUX vs CBRL
Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.
SBUX vs PLAY
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe SBUX can reaccelerate growth and sustain its premium margins enough to justify a 64.6x P/E, then hold; otherwise, the data support reducing exposure because EAT offers faster growth and better margins at much lower valuation multiples.
SBUX trades at a large premium to EAT on both earnings and sales despite materially slower growth. The implied price of $43.05 versus the current price of $105.26 suggests -59.1% downside under the P/E framework, while EAT implied range also sits well below spot.
Supporting Metrics
