Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: RUM stock price vs ESTC: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at ESTC's multiple
Needs Revenue / share, ESTC P/S.
Implied fair value · at RUM's multiple
Needs RUM P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
RUM GROUP INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
ELASTIC N.V. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Cloudflare, Inc.
RUM vs NET
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES INC
RUM vs AKAM
Alphabet Inc.
RUM vs GOOGL
Meta Platforms, Inc.
RUM vs META
Reddit, Inc.
RUM vs RDDT
Snap Inc
RUM vs SNAP
MongoDB, Inc.
RUM vs MDB
Palantir Technologies Inc.
RUM vs PLTR
Atlassian Corp
RUM vs TEAM
Gitlab Inc.
RUM vs GTLB
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe RUM can rapidly improve margins and sustain materially faster revenue growth, then hold or add only on weakness; otherwise, reduce exposure because the current price is far above the $1.37 ESTC-implied value and the operating profile remains well below ESTC’s.
RUM trades at 15.6x P/S versus ESTC at 3.5x P/S, while the valuation model implies only $1.37 per share for RUM versus a current price of $6.16. That implies a -77.8% downside and places RUM above its historical band of $5.54-$6.78.
Supporting Metrics
