Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: RTX stock price vs AXON: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at AXON's multiple
Needs AXON P/E.
Implied fair value · at RTX's multiple
Needs RTX P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
RTX CORPORATION · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Axon Enterprise, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$20.24
Base
$24.20
Bull
$29.36
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
General Electric Company
RTX vs GE
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
RTX vs HON
Parker-Hannifin Corp
RTX vs PH
Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc.
RTX vs SPR
TransDigm Group INC
RTX vs TDG
TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC
RTX vs TYL
TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INC
RTX vs TDY
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
RTX vs LMT
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP
RTX vs GD
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC.
RTX vs HII
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
RTX vs HWM
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe AXON's current profitability gap will close quickly and its growth will justify a far higher multiple, then the relative valuation case can work; otherwise, RTX looks more fundamentally robust and AXON's implied premium looks difficult to defend on the provided data.
On a P/E basis, AXON is far more expensive than RTX, and the implied price of $1,875.64 suggests an outsized premium versus RTX's current $223.03. AXON-implied range of $1,097.14 to $3,476.92 sits dramatically above both RTX's historical band and its DCF range, indicating the comparison is dominated by AXON's very high multiple rather than RTX's earnings power.
Supporting Metrics
