Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: RSG stock price vs GFL: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at GFL's multiple
Needs GFL P/E.
Implied fair value · at RSG's multiple
Needs EPS (TTM), RSG P/E.
Snapshot Sep 4, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: RSG FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025) · GFL FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025).
Trendline
Five fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Capital structure 83% equity / 17% debt · EV / Revenue 4.30x · EV / EBITDA 30.50x
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
GFL Environmental Inc. · implied price per share
The ordinary-share to listed-security ratio could not be verified.
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
1.15x
—
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
5.08x
2.75x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$76.00M
$85.60M
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
$13.71B
$11.81B
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe GFL's reported margins and earnings are not directly comparable or are distorted, then avoid using the P/E gap alone to justify selling RSG, because RSG's growth, margins, and ROIC are clearly stronger while its price is still within its historical band.
On the provided P/E comparison, RSG trades at 30.7x versus GFL at 5.7x, which mechanically produces the large negative implied upside shown in the valuation output. However, the cross-check with other valuation measures is mixed: RSG is only modestly richer on P/S, while GFL's margins and net income look highly anomalous relative to its revenue base.
Supporting Metrics
