Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: ROST stock price vs WCC: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at WCC's multiple
Needs WCC P/E.
Implied fair value · at ROST's multiple
Needs ROST P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Ross Stores, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
WESCO International, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
TJX COMPANIES INC /DE/
ROST vs TJX
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
ROST vs WBA
NORDSTROM INC
ROST vs JWN
Macy's, Inc.
ROST vs M
DILLARD'S, INC.
ROST vs DDS
TARGET CORP
ROST vs TGT
FASTENAL CO
ROST vs FAST
W.W. GRAINGER, INC.
ROST vs GWW
POOL CORP
ROST vs POOL
GENUINE PARTS CO
ROST vs GPC
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe ROST deserves to keep trading at a premium because its superior margins, ROIC, and balance sheet quality are sustainable, then holding is reasonable; otherwise, the data argue for caution because the current P/E-based valuation implies -20.6% downside despite stronger fundamentals.
ROST is trading above the model-implied price of $185.04 versus the current price of $233.06, indicating a -20.6% downside gap on the provided P/E basis. Relative to WCC, ROST also carries a much richer valuation across P/E, P/S, and EV multiples, suggesting the market is paying up for quality.
Supporting Metrics
