Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 ·
Decision snapshot: ROST stock price vs NWL: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at NWL's multiple
Needs NWL P/E.
Implied fair value · at ROST's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Ross Stores, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
NEWELL BRANDS INC. · implied price per share
Bear
-$9.19
Base
-$9.00
Bull
-$8.67
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
TJX COMPANIES INC /DE/
ROST vs TJX
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
ROST vs WBA
NORDSTROM INC
ROST vs JWN
Macy's, Inc.
ROST vs M
DILLARD'S, INC.
ROST vs DDS
TARGET CORP
ROST vs TGT
PROCTER & GAMBLE Co
ROST vs PG
COLGATE PALMOLIVE CO
ROST vs CL
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP
ROST vs IBM
CLOROX CO /DE/
ROST vs CLX
WHIRLPOOL CORP /DE/
ROST vs WHR
ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES INC
ROST vs EL
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe ROST can sustain its current profitability and growth profile, then avoid using NWL as a valuation anchor for downside estimates because NWL's negative earnings and leveraged balance sheet distort the relative-multiple comparison.
ROST's current price of $251.07 sits well above NWL-implied value of $23.37, implying a -90.7% downside on the simple P/S framework. However, the gap is largely explained by ROST's superior fundamentals versus NWL's distressed earnings and leverage profile, making NWL-multiple comparison directionally informative but not fully comparable.
Supporting Metrics
