Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: ROST stock price vs NTAP: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at NTAP's multiple
Needs NTAP P/E.
Implied fair value · at ROST's multiple
Needs ROST P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Ross Stores, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
NetApp, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$88.82
Base
$102.84
Bull
$121.94
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
TJX COMPANIES INC /DE/
ROST vs TJX
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
ROST vs WBA
NORDSTROM INC
ROST vs JWN
Macy's, Inc.
ROST vs M
DILLARD'S, INC.
ROST vs DDS
TARGET CORP
ROST vs TGT
Pure Storage, Inc.
ROST vs PSTG
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP
ROST vs IBM
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
ROST vs MU
Dell Technologies Inc.
ROST vs DELL
Seagate Technology Holdings plc
ROST vs STX
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co
ROST vs HPE
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe ROST can sustain above-NTAP revenue growth while preserving margins and its conservative balance sheet, then holding or adding selectively makes sense because the company already has lower sales-based multiples than NTAP and stronger leverage metrics; otherwise, the higher P/E versus NTAP argues for caution.
ROST’s current price of $232.53 is 11.0% below the P/E-derived implied price of $207.07, indicating modest downside on this framework but not a severe dislocation. Against the broader valuation set, ROST looks cheaper on P/S and EV/Revenue than NTAP, while still trading at a higher P/E and EV/EBITDA.
Supporting Metrics
