Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: ROK stock price vs TER: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at TER's multiple
Needs TER P/E.
Implied fair value · at ROK's multiple
Needs ROK P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Rockwell Automation, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$89.50
Base
$109.62
Bull
$135.82
TERADYNE, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO
ROK vs EMR
Parker-Hannifin Corp
ROK vs PH
DANAHER CORP /DE/
ROK vs DHR
Eaton Corp plc
ROK vs ETN
COGNEX CORP
ROK vs CGNX
APPLIED MATERIALS INC /DE
ROK vs AMAT
INTEL CORP
ROK vs INTC
LAM RESEARCH CORP
ROK vs LRCX
KLA CORP
ROK vs KLAC
SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS, INC.
ROK vs SWKS
LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP
ROK vs LSCC
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe the market should narrow ROK's margin and growth gap to TER (i.e., ROK can improve gross/EBITDA/net margins or accelerate revenue growth), then buy to ROK TER-implied level (~$556.88, ~32% upside) because ROK trades at lower P/E, P/S and EV/EBITDA despite strong ROIC and scale; otherwise, hold or avoid given TER's superior margins, higher growth and cleaner balance sheet.
Rockwell's implied TER-based price of $556.88 implies 32.1% upside vs the current $421.66, reflecting a valuation gap driven by applying TER's multiples to ROK. On a multiples basis ROK is cheaper across P/E, P/S and EV/EBITDA but still sits within its historical trading band ($379.49 - $463.83).
Supporting Metrics
