RLI Corp
$5.78B- Market cap
- $5.73B
- Debt
- +$100.00M
- Cash
- −$51.57M
Capital structure 98% equity / 2% debt · EV / Revenue 3.07x · EV / EBITDA 11.23x
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 · Mkt capMarket cap $5.73B · View financials
Snapshot Sep 4, 4:00 PM ET
FY 2025 · Mkt cap
Decision snapshot: RLI stock price vs HRL: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at HRL's multiple
Needs HRL P/E.
Implied fair value · at RLI's multiple
Needs RLI P/E.
Snapshot Sep 4, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Multiple premium
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: RLI FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025) · HRL FY 2025 (ended Oct 26, 2025). Fiscal years are not aligned.
Trendline
Five fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Capital structure 98% equity / 2% debt · EV / Revenue 3.07x · EV / EBITDA 11.23x
Capital structure 81% equity / 19% debt · EV / Revenue 1.16x · EV / EBITDA 14.09x
HRL carries the larger enterprise value at $14.01B against $5.78B; HRL trades on the lower EV / Revenue multiple (1.16x vs 3.07x); RLI on the lower EV / EBITDA (11.23x vs 14.09x).
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
RLI Corp · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
0.06x
0.36x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
0.09x
2.17x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$51.57M
$703.59M
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
TRAVELERS COMPANIES, INC.
RLI vs TRV
Chubb Ltd
RLI vs CB
ALLSTATE CORP
RLI vs ALL
HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
RLI vs THG
HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
RLI vs HIG
MARKEL GROUP INC.
RLI vs MKL
TYSON FOODS, INC.
RLI vs TSN
CONAGRA BRANDS INC.
RLI vs CAG
J M SMUCKER Co
RLI vs SJM
GENERAL MILLS INC
RLI vs GIS
KELLANOVA
RLI vs K
PEPSICO INC
RLI vs PEP
$100.00M
$2.86B
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
The deterministic comparison remains available. Sign in when you want an on-demand narrative synthesis of the same data.