Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: RIO stock price vs X: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at X's multiple
Needs X P/E.
Implied fair value · at RIO's multiple
Needs RIO P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
RIO TINTO PLC · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
United States Steel Corp · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC
RIO vs FCX
NEWMONT Corp /DE/
RIO vs NEM
Vale S.A.
RIO vs VALE
SOUTHERN COPPER CORP/
RIO vs SCCO
TECK RESOURCES LTD
RIO vs TECK
NUCOR CORP
RIO vs NUE
STEEL DYNAMICS INC
RIO vs STLD
COMMERCIAL METALS Co
RIO vs CMC
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS INC.
RIO vs CLF
WARRIOR MET COAL, INC.
RIO vs HCC
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe RIO’s strong margin structure and revenue growth can be sustained despite high leverage, then holding or accumulating on pullbacks is reasonable because RIO’s fundamentals are far stronger than X’s, even though the current price sits above the DCF range.
RIO is trading at $95.90, which sits near the upper end of its historical band of $86.31 to $105.49. Against the DCF range of $48.49 to $65.60, the stock appears materially above intrinsic value estimates, but the lack of a X valuation multiple for X limits direct relative pricing comparison.
Supporting Metrics
