Quick read
Fair Value Engine
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot
RH stock price vs JWN: inconclusive
Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Price gap
N/A
Coverage
Medium · 60%
Free account · revisit it from your workspace
Quick read
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Metric-by-metric
Filter, sort, and scan where each company leads, where gaps are small, and where comparisons are not meaningful.
| Metric | RH | JWN | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
Revenue growth (YoY) RH: FY 2025 -> FY 2026 | JWN: FY 2024 -> FY 2025 | 8.1% | 2.2% | RH leads by 270.1% Higher Revenue growth |
Gross margin | 44.1% | 34.6% | RH leads by 27.3% Higher Gross margin |
EBITDA margin | 22.0% | 9.9% | RH leads by 122.0% Higher EBITDA margin |
EV/Revenue | N/M | N/M | Insufficient data No additional context |
P/E | N/M | N/M | Not comparable Not comparable |
Net debt / EBITDA | -0.2 | 1.2 | RH leads by 119.5% Lower Net debt / EBITDA |
Statements
Core income statement and balance sheet metrics aligned to the reporting windows.
| Metric | RH | Delta vs JWN | JWN |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.44B | 77.1% lower | $15.02B |
| Gross profit | $1.52B | 70.9% lower | $5.20B |
| Operating income | $387.27M | 53.6% lower | $834.00M |
| EBITDA | $755.50M | 49.2% lower | $1.49B |
| Net income | $124.79M | 57.6% lower | $294.00M |
| EPS | 6.3 | 262.6% higher | 1.7 |
| Revenue growth | 8.1% | 270.1% higher | 2.2% |
| Gross margin | 44.1% | 27.3% higher | 34.6% |
| Operating margin | 11.3% | 102.7% higher | 5.6% |
| EBITDA margin | 22.0% | 122.0% higher | 9.9% |
| Net margin | 3.6% | 85.3% higher | 2.0% |
Trendline
Track multi-year revenue, earnings, and margin direction before underwriting a rerating.
Price framework
Market cap + debt - cash, shown for the current pair and benchmark median context.
Price framework
Baseline discounted cash flow model estimating total intrinsic firm value first, then bridging to an implied stock price per share.
Risk control
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Comparable set
Place both companies in context relative to a wider comparable universe.
LLM-powered Synthesis
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
RH trades at a modest current multiple with materially stronger growth and margins than JWN, but the case is offset by RH’s poor ROIC and weak quality signals, while JWN’s balance sheet remains more leveraged.
If you believe RH can sustain its stronger revenue growth and margin profile without the ROIC weakness worsening, then RH looks attractive relative to its DCF range because the current price of $165.52 remains well below $255.68 to $345.92.
RH is priced at 26.2x P/E and 0.9x P/S, with enterprise multiples of 3.9x EV/EBITDA and 0.9x EV/Revenue, but the provided JWN valuation metrics for JWN are unavailable, limiting direct multiple-based spread analysis. On a price framework, RH sits inside its historical band of $148.97 to $182.07 and well below the DCF range of $255.68 to $345.92, suggesting the market is not fully discounting the higher intrinsic value implied by the model.
Supporting Metrics