Quick read
Fair Value Engine
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot
R stock price vs TPG: inconclusive
Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Price gap
N/A
Coverage
Medium · 60%
Free account · revisit it from your workspace
Quick read
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Latest stored price
Metric-by-metric
Filter, sort, and scan where each company leads, where gaps are small, and where comparisons are not meaningful.
| Metric | R | TPG | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
Revenue growth (YoY) FY 2024 -> FY 2025 | 0.2% | 33.4% | TPG leads by 99.3% Higher Revenue growth |
Gross margin | 76.5% | 12.3% | R leads by 520.8% Higher Gross margin |
EBITDA margin | 28.6% | 20.1% | R leads by 42.1% Higher EBITDA margin |
EV/Revenue | N/M | N/M | Insufficient data No additional context |
P/E | N/M | N/M | Not comparable Not comparable |
Net debt / EBITDA | 2.1 | 1.0 | TPG leads by 117.0% Lower Net debt / EBITDA |
Statements
Core income statement and balance sheet metrics aligned to the reporting windows.
| Metric | R | Delta vs TPG | TPG |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.67B | 171.2% higher | $4.67B |
| Gross profit | $9.69B | 1583.6% higher | $575.81M |
| Operating income | — | N/A | — |
| EBITDA | $3.62B | 285.3% higher | $939.97M |
| Net income | $499.00M | 16.8% lower | $599.59M |
| EPS | 11.9 | 2553.3% higher | 0.5 |
| Revenue growth | 0.2% | 99.3% lower | 33.4% |
| Gross margin | 76.5% | 520.8% higher | 12.3% |
| Operating margin | — | N/A | — |
| EBITDA margin | 28.6% | 42.1% higher | 20.1% |
| Net margin | 3.9% | 69.3% lower | 12.8% |
Trendline
Track multi-year revenue, earnings, and margin direction before underwriting a rerating.
Price framework
Market cap + debt - cash, shown for the current pair and benchmark median context.
Price framework
Baseline discounted cash flow model estimating total intrinsic firm value first, then bridging to an implied stock price per share.
Risk control
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Comparable set
Place both companies in context relative to a wider comparable universe.
LLM-powered Synthesis
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
R trades at a much lower earnings and cash-flow multiple than TPG, but the valuation gap is partly explained by TPG's far stronger growth and lighter leverage.
If you believe R can reaccelerate growth while sustaining its 28.6% EBITDA margin and managing 2.1x net debt/EBITDA, then R looks attractive versus TPG on earnings and EV multiples because its current valuation is far below TPG-implied P/E result; otherwise, the large gap is better viewed as justified by TPG's much faster growth.
R's current price of $265.54 is far below the P/E-implied value of $1,266.70, suggesting a large theoretical upside of 377.0% if it were valued like TPG multiple. However, TPG benchmark is stretched by TPG's 106.1x P/E and 33.4% revenue growth, so the gap reflects both a valuation discount and a business-quality difference.
Supporting Metrics