Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: QSR stock price vs KO: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at KO's multiple
Needs KO P/E.
Implied fair value · at QSR's multiple
Needs QSR P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
11 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
RESTAURANT BRANDS INTERNATIONAL INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
COCA COLA CO · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
MCDONALDS CORP
QSR vs MCD
YUM BRANDS INC
QSR vs YUM
CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL INC
QSR vs CMG
DOMINOS PIZZA INC
QSR vs DPZ
PEPSICO INC
QSR vs PEP
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
QSR vs KDP
Monster Beverage Corp
QSR vs MNST
NATIONAL BEVERAGE CORP
QSR vs FIZZ
MOLSON COORS BEVERAGE CO
QSR vs TAP
HERSHEY CO
QSR vs HSY
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe QSR can sustain its 12.2% revenue growth while improving margins and deleveraging from 4.8x net debt/EBITDA, then QSR looks worth holding or adding; otherwise, the current valuation already embeds enough optimism to justify caution.
QSR’s current price of $72.92 sits above the DCF range midpoint but below KO-implied valuation band, while the modeled P/E implied price of $67.01 suggests about 8.1% downside. The gap is driven by QSR’s lower-margin, higher-leverage profile versus KO, even though QSR grows revenue faster.
Supporting Metrics
