Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: QSR stock price vs BLMN: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at BLMN's multiple
Needs BLMN P/E.
Implied fair value · at QSR's multiple
Needs QSR P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
11 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
RESTAURANT BRANDS INTERNATIONAL INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
MCDONALDS CORP
QSR vs MCD
YUM BRANDS INC
QSR vs YUM
CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL INC
QSR vs CMG
DOMINOS PIZZA INC
QSR vs DPZ
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC
QSR vs EAT
CHEESECAKE FACTORY INC
QSR vs CAKE
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
QSR vs TXRH
BJs RESTAURANTS INC
QSR vs BJRI
CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC
QSR vs CBRL
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe QSR can sustain double-digit revenue growth and keep operating margins near current levels, then hold or add because QSR’s profitability and ROIC are far stronger than BLMN’s and justify a premium multiple; if you expect growth to slow or leverage to constrain execution, then the current price looks less compelling versus the DCF and historical band.
QSR trades at 31.5x P/E, 2.7x P/S, and 14.9x EV/EBITDA versus BLMN at 86.6x, 0.2x, and 6.9x, respectively, so QSR is structurally more expensive on revenue and earnings measures despite much better operating performance. The implied price of $203.51 versus the current $74.02 suggests 174.9% upside, but that appears inconsistent with the stock’s own historical band and DCF range.
Supporting Metrics
