Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: QCOM stock price vs HUBS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at HUBS's multiple
Needs HUBS P/E.
Implied fair value · at QCOM's multiple
Needs QCOM P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
QUALCOMM INC/DE · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
HubSpot, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Broadcom Inc.
QCOM vs AVGO
INTEL CORP
QCOM vs INTC
NVIDIA CORP
QCOM vs NVDA
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
QCOM vs TXN
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC
QCOM vs AMD
Qorvo, Inc.
QCOM vs QRVO
Salesforce, Inc.
QCOM vs CRM
ADOBE INC.
QCOM vs ADBE
INTUIT INC.
QCOM vs INTU
Atlassian Corp
QCOM vs TEAM
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe QCOM can sustain its current profitability and grow closer to HUBS-like revenue rates without a material multiple reset, then hold or add; otherwise, the DCF range of $100.16 to $135.51 suggests the stock may be overextended relative to intrinsic value.
On a P/E basis, QCOM at 47.7x is far cheaper than HUBS at 269.9x, but QCOM is still priced well above its DCF range and above the low end of its historical band. The implied price of $1,352.23 versus the current $238.98 suggests a very large theoretical upside from the chosen multiple framework, but that result is not consistent with the DCF range of $100.16 to $135.51.
Supporting Metrics
