Qualcomm Inc/De
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- —
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: QCOM stock price vs DXC: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at DXC's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, DXC P/E.
Implied fair value · at QCOM's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, QCOM P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
QUALCOMM INC/DE · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
DXC Technology Co · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
QCOM · not enough data.
DXC · not enough data.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Broadcom Inc.
QCOM vs AVGO
INTEL CORP
QCOM vs INTC
NVIDIA CORP
QCOM vs NVDA
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
QCOM vs TXN
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC
QCOM vs AMD
Qorvo, Inc.
QCOM vs QRVO
Accenture plc
QCOM vs ACN
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP
QCOM vs IBM
COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORP
QCOM vs CTSH
EPAM Systems, Inc.
QCOM vs EPAM
Genpact LTD
QCOM vs G
UNISYS CORP
QCOM vs UIS
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe QCOM can sustain its current margin and growth profile, then QCOM looks attractive relative to DXC because it combines much stronger profitability and lower leverage with a far more reasonable earnings multiple than DXC, despite the DCF and historical range suggesting less room for immediate rerating.
The P/E-based implied price of $563.12 suggests a very large upside versus QCOM's current price of $147.61, but that output should be viewed alongside the much tighter historical band of $132.85-$162.37 and DCF range of $100.54-$136.03. The valuation gap is driven by QCOM's materially stronger earnings power and growth relative to DXC, which makes a direct P/E comparison highly favorable to QCOM.
Supporting Metrics