Prudential Financial Inc
$41.77B- Market cap
- $41.19B
- Debt
- +$20.30B
- Cash
- −$19.71B
Capital structure 67% equity / 33% debt · EV / Revenue 0.69x
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: PRU stock price vs PENN: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PENN's multiple
Needs PENN P/E.
Implied fair value · at PRU's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Capital structure 67% equity / 33% debt · EV / Revenue 0.69x
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
PENN ENTERTAINMENT, INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
PRU vs AIG
AFLAC INC
PRU vs AFL
METLIFE INC
PRU vs MET
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC
PRU vs PFG
GLOBE LIFE INC.
PRU vs GL
MGM Resorts International
PRU vs MGM
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
PRU vs CZR
WYNN RESORTS LTD
PRU vs WYNN
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP
PRU vs LVS
Churchill Downs Inc
PRU vs CHDN
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
The deterministic comparison remains available. Sign in when you want an on-demand narrative synthesis of the same data.