Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: PPC stock price vs MAS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MAS's multiple
Needs MAS P/E.
Implied fair value · at PPC's multiple
Needs PPC P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
PILGRIM’S PRIDE CORPORATION · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Masco Corporation · implied price per share
Bear
$33.41
Base
$39.67
Bull
$49.61
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
TYSON FOODS, INC.
PPC vs TSN
HORMEL FOODS CORP /DE/
PPC vs HRL
CAL-MAINE FOODS INC
PPC vs CALM
HOME DEPOT, INC.
PPC vs HD
PPG INDUSTRIES INC
PPC vs PPG
SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO
PPC vs SHW
Vulcan Materials CO
PPC vs VMC
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS INC
PPC vs MLM
MOHAWK INDUSTRIES INC
PPC vs MHK
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe PPC can sustain its 3.5% revenue growth while maintaining current margins and not justifiably trade at a large discount to MAS’s 21.4x P/E, then PPC looks attractive because it is priced at only 6.3x earnings and 4.1x EV/EBITDA; otherwise, the premium quality and much higher margins at MAS may be the better justification for the valuation gap.
PPC trades at a steep valuation discount to MAS on both earnings and sales metrics, which points to a large pricing gap. However, the market appears to be pricing in PPC’s lower margin structure and more modest growth/quality profile versus MAS.
Supporting Metrics
