Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: PINS stock price vs TGT: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at TGT's multiple
Needs TGT P/E.
Implied fair value · at PINS's multiple
Needs PINS P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
15 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Pinterest, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Target Corporation · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Meta Platforms, Inc.
PINS vs META
Snap Inc
PINS vs SNAP
Alphabet Inc.
PINS vs GOOGL
AMAZON COM INC
PINS vs AMZN
MICROSOFT CORP
PINS vs MSFT
Walmart Inc.
PINS vs WMT
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW
PINS vs COST
BEST BUY CO INC
PINS vs BBY
ROSS STORES, INC.
PINS vs ROST
NORDSTROM INC
PINS vs JWN
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe PINS can sustain its 15.8% revenue growth and preserve its 80.1% gross margin, then hold or accumulate selectively because its stronger operating profile and net-cash balance sheet partially offset the bearish P/E-based implied price.
On the provided P/E-based framework, PINS appears expensive versus the implied price, with a current price of $23.33 versus an implied $11.04, or -52.7% downside. However, the broader relative valuation picture is more balanced because PINS also trades at a lower EV/EBITDA and similar P/S versus TGT.
Supporting Metrics
