Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: PINS stock price vs EMN: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at EMN's multiple
Needs EMN P/E.
Implied fair value · at PINS's multiple
Needs PINS P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
16 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Pinterest, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
EASTMAN CHEMICAL CO · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Meta Platforms, Inc.
PINS vs META
Snap Inc
PINS vs SNAP
Alphabet Inc.
PINS vs GOOGL
AMAZON COM INC
PINS vs AMZN
MICROSOFT CORP
PINS vs MSFT
Celanese Corp
PINS vs CE
DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
PINS vs DD
ALBEMARLE CORP
PINS vs ALB
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
PINS vs LYB
ECOLAB INC.
PINS vs ECL
PPG INDUSTRIES INC
PINS vs PPG
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe PINS can sustain 15.8% revenue growth and eventually expand operating margin from 7.6% toward a higher EMN-like level, then hold or accumulate selectively; otherwise, the current 36.2x P/E and $10.25 implied price argue for caution because the stock already trades above the DCF range and well above the relative-value estimate.
PINS trades at 36.2x P/E versus EMN at 16.8x, while the implied price of $10.25 suggests 53.6% downside from the current $22.08. The gap is less severe on sales-based metrics because PINS has a lower P/S and EV/Revenue than EMN, but the earnings multiple still drives a wide negative relative valuation signal.
Supporting Metrics
